What was the decision of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke quizlet?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances. You just studied 8 terms!
How did the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Supreme Court decision affect affirmative action programs in the US apex?
The case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke changed the affirmative action programs in the US because the US Supreme Court declared that affirmative actions were constitutional, but the use of racial quotas was invalidated.
What argument did the university make in Regents v Bakke quizlet?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California. Is race in admissions always unlawful?
Is Proposition 209 still in effect?
5 (ACA 5). … Proposition 16 was rejected by voters in the November 2020 election, meaning that Prop 209 remains in the California Constitution. 57% of voters rejected Proposition 16, and favored keeping Prop 209, implying that Californians support race neutrality more than they did in 1996.
What were the effects of the Plessy v Ferguson decision Check all that apply quizlet?
It stopped states from creating segregation laws. It established a new precedent in declaring the law constitutional. It limited the rights of African American citizens. It allowed the policy of “separate but equal” to continue.
What Bakke means?
Dutch: from Middle Dutch bac ‘bucket’, ‘bin’, ‘beaker’, hence a metonymic occupational name for a maker of such vessels. Dutch: nickname for someone with a peculiarity of the mouth, jaw, or cheek, from Dutch bakke ‘cheek’, ‘side’.
Who hears evidence and offers a verdict?
The judge makes a decision or the jury gives its verdict, based on the testimony and other evidence presented during trial. 8.
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What did the Supreme Court decide in the Bakke case quizlet?
What was the ruling in the Bakke case? The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that Bakke’s rejection was illegal and order the medical school to admit him.
What was the main outcome of the Supreme Court case of Griggs v Duke Power quizlet?
1971: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits not only intentional job discrimination, but also employer practices that have a discriminatory effect on minorities and women.
Why was the issue in Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 sometimes called reverse discrimination 4 points Bakke was rejected after he had been accepted at medical school Bakke was a white male who had better grades than some minority applicants?
Bakke was rejected after he had been accepted at medical school. Bakke was a white male who had better grades than some minority applicants. The university had set aside a certain number of spots for white applicants. The university had set aside more spots for minorities than for white applicants.
Who was responsible for initially questioning?
Allan Bakke was responsible.